Quote from: Daniel Drysdale on December 07, 2007, 12:46:53 PM
Two months ago I posted an open call for anyone who really wants native support for the Topfield to email support@icetv.com.au so that I could present a business case to management to do the loader, in the same post I pledged to support any developer who was prepared to do the job that we are not currently able to do.... In two months we have received exactly 1 email. If I went to my boss and told him that it appears that the Mac using Topfield community consists of less then half a dozen people and that I would like to commit 2-3 man weeks of time to writing a loader, well, you can imagine the response...
Err... was I the solitary email? Cause I forgot whether I emailed you or not. ;)
Just remember that old business saying though, that for every complaint you actually receive, there are at least another 9 that you never hear of. I can remember off the top of my head at least 4 or 5 users on this forum who have posted about the Mac/Toppy thing. Expecting your market research to be done for you by your target market is a bit of an ambitious way of going about things. :)
In all seriousness, if you're not going to do your own market research on this, there probably needs to be a bit of faith-based, "if we build it they will come" mentality going on at Ice. Otherwise I think you miss Rod's point about the growing, high-spending, tech-savvy Mac market out there. This is complete speculation, but I see a correlation between the type of people who buy Topfields, and the type of people who are converting to Macs (primarily from a Unix backgorund, like myself.) You have no idea of how many tens or possibly hundreds of subscriptions you've missed out on from Mac/Toppy people who did their research, found out they can't use Ice properly with their setup, and then decided they'd just keep the pain of using the free solutions out there. After all, currently for Mac/Toppy users, the pain of using Ice is only slightly better than the pain of the free solutions. Or they just silently grumbled and pull out an old Windows based laptop every now and then to do their updates. Expecting these people to email you is a bit of wishful thinking - it's never going to happen.
In saying all that, I do totally agree with the main point you've made before about being an acceptable risk/reward trade off for Ice doing this (you wouldn't be a business if you didn't!) If you're not prepared to have a slightly more optimistic view about the reward (what I, and others, have suggested above), then can you please re-assess the risk component? The two risks you've mentioned are:
1) Time taken to code/test/document/support the Mac loader. You've stated that it will likely be 2-3 weeks of man time to do the initial coding; however, you can probably see why to the outsider this seems a tad conservative as very little new code seemingly needs to be written, as all the hard bits already exist in other applications (as you mentioned for the IceBox.) Instead, would Ice be willing to commit about half a man-day for someone to actually go and spec the work required properly? I'm presuming the 2-3 weeks is just a guestimate at the moment. Maybe we'll be pleasantly surprised that when you look at it, it really only turns out to be 1-2 days after all. Or maybe it will turn out to be 2 months. At least then you'll be able to give a good justification to the Mac/Toppy owners of why you're not doing it.
2) Risk of being responsible for bricked Toppies. Seriously? As people have mentioned before, every non-Windows Toppy owner out there (in the world, not just Ice users) is using unsanctioned software to use their Toppies. And will happily release all responsibility from the software authors that let them do this. Surely you can put a nice boilerplate software license around the software, as well as big blinking neon warnings on the download page that for those tech-savvy Mac/Toppy users who are willing to do this, that they are on their own? Heck, you can even say it's officially unsupported and we can't ring you if we have trouble getting it working. Again, the type of people who are calling for this I think will, by and large, not care (even the non-tech-savvy.)
And Daniel, thank you for patiently taking the time to keep on discussing this issue with those of us who continue to grumble about it, even if we currently seem at odds on some of the points. It's very much appreciated, and is probably one of the main reasons we're still around here grumbling and not just given Ice up for dead. And just imagine how pee'd off we'd be if you'd given us the cold shoulder instead! :P