Very nice, and rather obvious points indeed. Except that plenty of software and drivers didn't fully support Windows 7, including Virus Protection, Email Spam filters, CD/DVD writers/creators, Video Card drivers and TV Tuner Decoders, to name but a few. Due to underlying Kernel changes, all there products required changes to work correctly on Windows 7. Guess what, the leading brands of virus makers have updated, Spam filters are updated, disk writers, video and tuner decoders, etc, etc, you get the point.
Yes, there are plenty of things that didn't require much or any changes, but far more did, because this ISN'T Windows Vista!! If nothing needed updating, then the Kernel would be exactly the same and this would be Vista SP3. The point is they DID make changes, big changes, and these big changes have required MOST driver and software makers to make changes. You know what the difference is? Most of these companies made the changes MONTHS ago, so support has already been there for months. So of course most aren't putting up new drivers today - the driver from August was already updated with full support!!
Now, let me make something very clear indeed. I actually wasn't annoyed to know IceTV wouldn't be ready. What pissed me off enough was people like yourself making excuses. I'm so sick of people like you making excuses. You'd do yourself well to get a job as a politician, maybe Health Minister? Then you could try you hand of explaining away why people are still waiting to get into a hospital.
Oh, and next time you try to use a BIG persons words, look them up first. Specious = "plausible but false". For My Movies to fit into this category, it would need to comply with the "false" part of specious reasoning. Point in fact, Specious, would be a very good description of your point that Vista drivers work on Windows 7, because the driver framework is the same. Plausible, but false!! nVidia and ATI have already stated as such.
Quote: "However, the main point is that what works on Vista will work on Windows 7". Plausible, but false! Virus protection worked on Vista, needed to be updated to Windows 7. This was also done months ago, updates already intergrated.
Yes, there are plenty of things that didn't require much or any changes, but far more did, because this ISN'T Windows Vista!! If nothing needed updating, then the Kernel would be exactly the same and this would be Vista SP3. The point is they DID make changes, big changes, and these big changes have required MOST driver and software makers to make changes. You know what the difference is? Most of these companies made the changes MONTHS ago, so support has already been there for months. So of course most aren't putting up new drivers today - the driver from August was already updated with full support!!
Now, let me make something very clear indeed. I actually wasn't annoyed to know IceTV wouldn't be ready. What pissed me off enough was people like yourself making excuses. I'm so sick of people like you making excuses. You'd do yourself well to get a job as a politician, maybe Health Minister? Then you could try you hand of explaining away why people are still waiting to get into a hospital.
Oh, and next time you try to use a BIG persons words, look them up first. Specious = "plausible but false". For My Movies to fit into this category, it would need to comply with the "false" part of specious reasoning. Point in fact, Specious, would be a very good description of your point that Vista drivers work on Windows 7, because the driver framework is the same. Plausible, but false!! nVidia and ATI have already stated as such.
Quote: "However, the main point is that what works on Vista will work on Windows 7". Plausible, but false! Virus protection worked on Vista, needed to be updated to Windows 7. This was also done months ago, updates already intergrated.